SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(All) 554

S.S.AHMAD
Shiv Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. K. Trivedi, S. K. Mehrotra

JUDGMENT

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.

1. THE present writ petition is directed against the proceedings relating to the allotment of chak under the provisions of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act.

2. CHAK no. 422 was proposed to be allotted to the petitioner while the chak no. 39 was proposed to be allotted to Gurdin (opposite party no. 2). It appears that in the objections which were filed by the petitioner it was claimed that since he had his "abadi" in plot no. 113, he may be allotted a chak adjacent to that plot towards south and that Gurdin (opposite party no. 2) may be accommodated towards south-west of the said plot. These objections were disposed of by the Consolidation Officer by his order dated 28-3-1980 and the objections were dismissed.

The petitioner then filed an appeal, which was allowed by the Assistant Settlement Officer (Consolidation) on 12-4-1980. The opposite party no. 2 Gurdin, thereafter filed a revision which was allowed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 4-8-1980. A certified copy of the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation is annexure 2 to the Writ Petition. It is in these circumstances that the present writ petition has been filed.

3. I











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top