SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 173

K.P.SINGH
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
V.S. Chaudhary

JUDGMENT

K.P. Singh, J.

1. This writ petition arises out of proceedings under section 122-B of the UP ZA and LR Act.

2. It appears on the report of Lekhpal proceedings for ejectment of the petitioners under section 122-B of the UP ZA and LR Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were initiated. In the aforesaid proceedings Lekhpal and Pradhan were examined who had deposed that the petitioners were not in possession over the disputed land yet the Tahsildar through his order dated 27-10-1983 ordered for ejectment of the petitioners and also awarded damages to the tune of Rs. 957/- payable to the Gaon Sabha as is evident from Annexure II attached with the writ petition. Thereafter an application was moved that the arguments were not complete, therefore the matter may be fully heard and then decided. That application appears to have been dismissed on 28-11-1983 (See Annexure III). Thereafter, the petitioners preferred a revision petition which has been dismissed through the order dated 23-4-1984 contained in Annexure V. A review petition was also filed which also failed. Aggrieved by the orders of the revenue courts the petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of the C















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top