SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 247

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
N.B. ASTHANA, J.
Ram Chandra Shukla - Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. - Respondent
Decided on : Feb 21, 1995

The Magistrate's power to direct police investigation under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. and the consideration of provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 before taking cognizance of the matter.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Societies Registration Act, 1860 - The court held that the Magistrate is empowered under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. to direct the police to investigate a complaint, despite a dispute regarding the formation of a Managing Committee pending with the Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The court emphasized that while the Magistrate has the power to pass an order under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C., the provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 must be considered before taking cognizance of the matter.

Fact of the Case:

The revision was directed against the order passed by the 1st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Dehat, directing the police to register a case and investigate it under Section 153 (3), Cr. P. C.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Magistrate was empowered to direct the police to investigate the complaint under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. despite the dispute regarding the formation of a Managing Committee pending with the Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The court dismissed the revision at the admission stage and directed the Court below to consider the provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 before taking cognizance in the matter.

Issues: Dispute regarding the formation of Managing Committee pending with the Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and the jurisdiction of the 1st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate to pass the order under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C.

Ratio Decidendi: The Magistrate is empowered under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. to direct the police to investigate a complaint, and the provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 must be considered before taking cognizance of the matter.

Final Decision: Revision dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. N. B. Asthana, J. This revision has been directed against the order dated 8-2-1995 passed by 1st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Dehat in Criminal Misc. Application No. 195 of 1995 under Section 153 (3), Cr. P. C. directing the police to register a case, investigate it and then proceed in the matter in accordance with law.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A. G. A.

The Magistrate is fully empowered under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. to direct the police to investigate the complaint made before him. It cannot, therefore, be said that the order passed by the Magistrate was without jurisdiction or not in accordance with law.

3. It was, however, urged that the dispute between the parties is regarding the formation of Managing Committee of Baba Raghunandan Das Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Kanpur Dehat and the matter regarding formation of Managing Committee is already pending with the Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and as such in view of Section 28 of the Act, the 1st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass such an order.

4. The aforesaid section only lays down that no cognizance shall be taken of an offence punishable under that Act except on a complaint made by the Registrar or any other person authorised in writing by him by general or special order in that behalf. This section does not curtail and cannot curtail the power of a Judicial Magistrate to pass order under Section 156 (3j, Cr. P. C. However, before taking cognizance of the matter, the Magistrate will take into consideration the provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and in case it is found that the cognizance cannot be taken except upon a complaint made by the Registrar, the Magistrate could not be entitled to proceed further in the matter unless the sanction of the Registrar is forth coming.

In view of the above the revision has no force and is dismissed at the admission stage. The Court below is directed to take note of the provisions of Section 28 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 before taking cognizance in the matter.

Revision dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top