ASHOK BHUSHAN, ABHINAVA UPADHYA
MAHIMA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Abhinava Upadhya, J.—This is a review application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and Order 47 Rule 5 of the CPC read with Chapter-V Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. The judgment sought to be reviewed has been passed in Special Appeal No. 734 of 2010 by Hon’ble R.K.Agrawal, Abhinava Upadhya, JJ. Justice R.K.Agrawal is no longer a Judge of this Court and, therefore, the matter was placed before us as one of us (Justice Abhinava Upadhya) was also a Member of the earlier Division Bench. The review of the judgment dated 17.5.2010 has been sought on the ground that the said judgment was pronounced relying upon the information from the State authorities which were incorrect and the same came to the light only after judgment was pronounced. Hence the review application.
2. The brief facts are, that the applicant pursuant to an advertisement had applied for Special BTC Training Course of 2008. The applicant applied in prescribed proforma, filling up the form and annexing therewith all the certificates regarding educational qualification. When she did not get any call letter for appearing in the test, she filed Writ Petition No. 8710 of 2010. This Court disposed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.