Arvind Kumar Tripathi (II), J.

1. Heard Sri Shiv Pal Singh learned Counsel for the revisionists and learned AGA for the State. This criminal revision has been preferred by revisionists challenging the order dated 31.3.2014 by which application under section 319 Cr.P.C. moved by the informant was partially allowed and revisionists were summoned for facing trial under section 319 Cr.P.C.

2. It was submitted by learned Counsel for the revisionists that Pravesh Kumar Singh was adopted by late Bachchu Singh and was living with his adoptive father separately from his natural father, mother and brothers. In this way, there was no occasion for the relatives of natural father demanding dowry.

3. As per factual matrix of the case a first information report was lodged by the opposite party No. 2 (Umesh Singh) in Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Bahraich on 6.9.2005 at about 8.15 p.m. against Pravesh Singh, Raja Singh son of Shiv Mangal Singh, Rajesh Singh son of Shiv Mangal Singh, wife of Raja Singh, wife of Shiv Mangal Singh and Rajendra Singh, under sections 498-A, 304-B, 201 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. After investigation charge-sheet was submitted against Pravesh Sing