SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3797

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Rama – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Harish Chandra Dwivedi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J. –

Supplementary counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri R.C. Singh for the petitioner and Sri A.N. Srivastava for the contesting respondents.

3. This writ petition has been filed against the orders of CO dated 12.8.2002 and DDC dated 13.3.2006, by which delay condonation application of the petitioner filed along with the objection u/s 9 of the Act has been rejected and objection was dismissed as time barred and revision has been dismissed.

4. Rama was co-sharer in plot nos. 331 and 357. It is alleged that Rama executed a sale deed dated 19.1.1976 in respect of his share in the aforesaid plots, in favour of Smt. Matuna Devi , respondent-4. On the basis of sale deed dated 19.1.1976, name of Smt. Matuna Devi was mutated over the land in dispute by order of Tahsildar dated 22.2.1977, passed in Case No. 2682. In basic consolidation year, khata no. 95 was carved out of the aforesaid two plot nos. 331 and 357, in which, names of other co-sharers of Rama along with Smt. Matuna Devi were recorded. The village was notified u/s 9 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 on 2.3.1995. The petitioner did not file any objection for recordin







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top