Rajiv Joshi, J.

Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri A.P. Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally at the admission stage itself.

4. Present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 16.3.2019 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation in Revision No. 501, whereby the revision was allowed setting aside the order dated 20.2.2016 passed by Consolidation Officer as well as order dated 7.4.2017 passed by Settlement Officer of Consolidation and remanded the matter to Consolidation Officer to decide it afresh.

5. Facts as reflect from record are that after the consolidation operation in the village, two objections were filed, one was filed by Lalmati, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner and other by Kawalpati, predecessor-in-interest of respondent no.2. Both the objections were decided by Consolidation Officer vide order dated 20.2.2016 and determined the share of the parties to the extent of 1/2 in the property in dispute. During the pendency of the objection before the Consolidat