SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(UK) 825

U.C.DHYANI
Gopal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. S.S. Adhikari, Brief Holder, Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

U.C. Dhyani, J.

1. The writ petitioners, by means of present Writ Petition, seek to quash the Case Crime No. 62 of 2016, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307 and 506 of IPC, lodged by respondent no. 2, at Police Station Kundeshwari, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. A compounding application being CRMA No. 12655 of 2016 has been filed by the parties, to indicate that they have buried their differences and have settled their disputes amicably. A joint compromise application is also filed by them along with affidavits of Gopal Singh (petitioner no.1), Arjun Singh (respondent no.2 / complainant / injured), Surender Singh (respondent no.3/injured). Respondent nos. 2 & 3 are present in person, duly identified by their counsel Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate. They (respondents no. 2 & 3) say that they have no grievance left against the writ petitioners and they are not interested in prosecuting the petitioners, inasmuch as, the dispute has been settled amicably between the parties with the intervention of some elderly persons of the society. In other words, respondent nos. 2 & 3 have exonerated the present petitioners. Petitioners Gopal Singh and Sonu @ Daljeet Singh are also presen










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top