P.D.MULYE, R.K.VIJAYWARGIYA
CHANDMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order shall also govern the disposal of M. P. No. 718 of 83 (Rameshchandra v. State of M. P. ).
( 2 ) BOTH these petitioners have filed these writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution, arising out of proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, whereby their lands situated in village Pithampur, District Dhar are being compulsorily acquired by the State Government for the establishment of industrial area. Respondent 1 is the State of M. P. respondent No. 2 is the Collector and District Magistrate, Dhar; respondent 3 is the Land Acquisition Officer, Directorate of Industries M. P. Bhopal; respondent 4 is the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Dhar; respondent 5 is the M. P. Audyogik Kendra vikas Nigam (Indore) Ltd; and respondent 6 is M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Poona.
( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to these petitions may be stated, in brief, thus: The State of Madhya Pradesh is industrially a backward state. The Govt. of India decided to industrialise the backward districts of the various States so that these backward districts are provided with employment potentials and the industrialisation may remove the economic backwardness of these areas. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.