SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(MP) 574

P.D.MULYE, R.K.VIJAYWARGIYA
CHANDMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.MATHUR, R.G.VAGHAMARE, R.S.Garg, S.L.GARG, S.R.JOSHI

P. D. MULYE, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall also govern the disposal of M. P. No. 718 of 83 (Rameshchandra v. State of M. P. ).

( 2 ) BOTH these petitioners have filed these writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution, arising out of proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, whereby their lands situated in village Pithampur, District Dhar are being compulsorily acquired by the State Government for the establishment of industrial area. Respondent 1 is the State of M. P. respondent No. 2 is the Collector and District Magistrate, Dhar; respondent 3 is the Land Acquisition Officer, Directorate of Industries M. P. Bhopal; respondent 4 is the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Dhar; respondent 5 is the M. P. Audyogik Kendra vikas Nigam (Indore) Ltd; and respondent 6 is M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Poona.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to these petitions may be stated, in brief, thus: The State of Madhya Pradesh is industrially a backward state. The Govt. of India decided to industrialise the backward districts of the various States so that these backward districts are provided with employment potentials and the industrialisation may remove the economic backwardness of these areas. The




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top