High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
R. K. VIJAYVARGIYA, V. D. GYANI
VINOD KUMAR - Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE INDORE - Respondents
MISC. PETN. 735 Of 1985
Decided On : 09/12/1985
DETENTION - PREVENTION OF BLACK MARKETING AND MAINTENANCE OF SUPPLIES OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1980 - SECTION 3 - VAGUENESS OF GROUNDS OF DETENTION - IRRELEVANT AND NON-EXISTENT MATERIAL CONSIDERED - ORDER OF DETENTION QUASHED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, challenged the detention of his father, Gopaldas Nagori, under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (the Act). The detaining authority alleged that the detenu was involved in the sale of Sagol and Murrum powder as cement, contravening the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Cement Apmishran Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1981 (the Adhiniyam).
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the ground of detention was too vague and did not provide sufficient particulars to enable the detenu to make an effective representation against his detention. Additionally, the court held that the detaining authority had taken into consideration irrelevant and non-existent material, such as the production, storage, and sale of Murrum powder, which is not covered by the definition of "cementitious material" under the Adhiniyam.
Issues: 1. Whether the ground of detention was too vague and deprived the detenu of an opportunity to make an effective representation? 2. Whether the detaining authority had taken into consideration irrelevant and non-existent material in passing the order of detention?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the ground of detention was too vague and did not provide sufficient particulars to enable the detenu to make an effective representation against his detention. The court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Prabhu Dayal Deorah v. District Magistrate, Kamrup, where it was held that a ground of detention must be specific and provide sufficient particulars to enable the detenu to make an effective representation. 2. The court also held that the detaining authority had taken into consideration irrelevant and non-existent material, such as the production, storage, and sale of Murrum powder, which is not covered by the definition of "cementitious material" under the Adhiniyam. The court held that this vitiated the order of detention.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the order of detention passed by the detaining authority. The detenu was ordered to be set at liberty forthwith.
( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner Vinod Kumar has challenged the detention of his father Gopaldas Nagori who has been ordered to be detained vide order No. Q/ps/det 85 dated 27-7-85 (Ann 'a') passed by the District Magistrate, Indore the respondent No. 1 in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sub-section (1) (b) (2) (a) of section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (for short the Act' ).
( 2 ) THE facts disclosed by the grounds of detention communicated to the detenu and the particulars mentioned in the schedule annexed thereto may be summarised as follows : The detenu is the proprietor of M/s Agrawal Industries Indore, Manager of M/s Usha Enterprises Indore and Attorney of Nagori Cement Private Ltd. Bagh district Dhar. M/s. Agrawal Industries are manufacturing Sagol and Murrum powder while Usha Enterprises are manufacturing Murrum powder. Sagol and Murrum are being packed in cement bags weighing 50 KG. and 40 KG. respectively. The colour of the cement and of the Sagol and Murrum powder is substantially similar. The cement produced by the M/s Nagori Cement Private Ltd is stored in the premises of M/s. Usha Enterprises. At the time of checking 115 bags of cement were found there. 204 bags Murrum powder was also found in 204 bags of cement in the premises of M/s. Usha Enterprises. 131 bags of Sagol and 168 bags of Murrum powder packed in cement bags were found in the stock of M/s. Agrawal Industries at the time of checking. M/s. Agrawal Industries and Usha Enterprises are located in front of each other. Although according to the provisions of M. P. Cement Apmishran Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1981 (for short 'the Adhiniyam') the weight of the bag in which Sagol and other cementitious material is packed should not exceed 35 kg. and the gunny bags in which it is packed should be different from the cement bags, in both the establishments of the detenu Sagol and Murrum powder was packed in cement bags weighing 50 and 40 kg. respectively. The cement produced by the Nagori Cement Private Ltd. was stocked in the premises of M/s. Usha Enterprises. Sagol and Murrum powder is stocked in M/s. Agrawal Industries and murrum powder and cement is stocked in the premises of Usha Enterprises.
( 3 ) ON the basis of the above fact it is stated by the detaining authority that it is clear that the detenu is a party to the sale of Sagol and Murrum powder as cement to the illiterate general public keeping them in the dark and is indulging in profitering by passing of Sagol and Murrum powder as cement, they being of the same colour, and is carrying on the illegal business of sale of the adulterated cement through the medium of unsocial elements and the act of the detenu is an attempt to defeat the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
( 4 ) AT the outset it would be useful to refer to the relevant statutory provisions. Section 3 of the Act reads as follows :"3. Power to make orders detaining certain persons.- (1) The Central Government or a State Government or any officer of the Central Government not below the rank of a joint Secretary to that Government specially empowered for the purposes of this section by that Government, or any officer of a State Government, not below the rank of a Secretary to that Government specially empowered for the purposes of this section by that Government, may, if satisfied, with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies of commodities essential to the community it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained. "
( 5 ) SECTION 2 (c) of the Adhiniyam defines cementitious material as follows :"2. Definitions in this Act, unless the context otherwise requires -" (c) 'cementitious material' means any material (by whatever name called) other than cement such as sagol or other si
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.