SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 98

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, S.A.NAQVI
SURESH CHANDRA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


A. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24. 11. 1994 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gwalior in Sessions Trial No. 170/86 convicting appellant under Section 302, IPC and sentencing him to suffer life imprisonment, the appellant has knocked the door of this Court by preferring this appeal under section 374 (2) of Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) IN brief the case of prosecution is that mithlesh (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased") is the wife of appellant Suresh Chandra. It is said that appellant was having illicit relations with one Durgesh nandani as a result of which deceased was an eyesore to the accused persons. In order to kill the deceased, in the night of 29. 5. 1986 at 9 poison was administered to her as a result of which her physical condition became deteriorated and ultimately she became unconscious as a result of which she was transmitted to Nursing Home of Dr. Bhagwanswaroop Gaurh where the doctor found her condition to be serious as such she was referred to the J. A. Group of hospital, Gwalior where the deceased was treated by Dr. Ripudaman, but she could not survive and ultimately, she died on 30. 5. 1986 at 11.


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top