SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 118

R.C.LAHOTI
KALYAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
VAKILSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN MISHRA, M.M.Kaushik

R. C. LAHOTI, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff/whose suit for declaration of title, issuance of permanent preventive injunction and for correction of revenue papers in respect of an agricultural holding has been dismissed by the two courts below, has come up in appeal.

( 2 ) THE suit property is land survey No. 451 area 2 Bigha 15 Biswas situated at village Kanuapura of Tehsil Lahar, Distt. Bhind. Undisputedly, the land was custodia legis on the date of the institution of the suit as having been attached by the Sub-divisional Magistrate under S. 145/ 146, Cr. P. C.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff, he acquired title with possession in the suit property from one Jairam s/o Ochhe under a registered sale deed 15-7-1967. However, the defendant has got himself entered in to revenue papers on the basis of an ex parte decree passed in C. O. S. 237a/63 which decree relates to survey No. 421 and not 451. Because the defendant has threatened the plaintiff with dispossession in denial of his/title and relying on the wrongful entry in the revenue papers, the plaintiff had to bring the suit. ( 4 ) THE defendant contested the case of the plaintiff by submitting that he was holding the land as subtenant. th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top