SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 870

M.A.SIDDIQUI, RAKESH SAKSENA
Ashwani Kumar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.C. Datta with Siddharth Datt for petitioner;
Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for State.

ORDER

M.A. Siddiqui, Jut. This revision has been preferred being aggrieved by the order dated 12.2.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 15/2009 by which 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur rejected the appeal by affirming the order passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate. Chhatarpur dated 1.1.2009 in Criminal Appeal No. 2468/2008 whereby the prayer of petitioner being Juvenile has been rejected.

2. According to revision the incident took place on 19.10.2008 under the jurisdiction of police Station-Civil Lines, District-Chhatarpur where Darbal Yadav had succumbed to his life, consequently offence punishable under section 307, 302/34 read with section 25/27 of Arms Act was registered vide Crime No. 349/2008. In that case petitioner was main accused with two other persons, namely, Jitendra Awasthy and Ashish Tiwari. The matter was investigated and challan was filed, undisputed fact is that petitioner has been punished in Sessions Trial No. 28/09 by 1st. Addl. Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur along with other accused persons treating him to be an adult man against which he has filed Criminal Appeal No. 1134/2009 which is pending in this Court.

3. The contention of petitioner is that he is a Juvenil













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top