SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11741

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JASVINDER KAUR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

AMIT SHARMA, J.

1. The present revision petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeks the following prayers:

“a. That the impugned order dated 21.09.2020 by the Special Judge POCSO at Tis Hazari be set aside;

b. That the matter for impleadment as Accused be re heard by the trial court;

c. That the court may call for the records of the case exercising its power;

d. That the Praveen Kumar, Ms. G.K. (name withheld) or any other person that the court may deem fir be summoned as the accused in the present matter before the Special Court;

e. Any other remedy that the Hon‟ble Court may provide in light of justice, equity and good conscience.”

BRIEF FACTS:

2. The brief facts leading up to the present petition are as follows:

i. Respondent no. 2 sent a complaint dated 10.09.2018 to the Director, Directorate of Education, Delhi alleging that his son (heretofore referred to as Master “VA” / PW-1), a minor aged about 12 years then, studying in class 7th in a public school had been sexually assaulted by few of his classmates in the preceding year [the name of the survivour and the school are withheld to protect the identity of the survivour in accordance with section 23 of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top