* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 3rd MAY, 2017 DECIDED ON : 25th AUGUST, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 4406/2013 & CRL.M.A.No.15774/2013 NATASHA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Dinesh Mathur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.K.Saxena, Mr.Kawal & Mr.Rohit, Advocates.

VERSUS CBI (STATE) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms.Garima Singh Yadav, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.

1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 05.10.2013 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge / Special Judge in CC No. 42/2001 whereby DW-6 (V.C.Mishra) examined in defence by the petitioner was not permitted to give evidence to render his opinion upon the report given by PW-32 (S.L.Mukhi).

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner along with others was facing trial before Special Judge, CBI. On 21.01.2013, the prosecution closed its evidence after examining 52 witnesses; it included PW-32 (S.L.Mukhi), retired Principal Scientific Officer, CFSL, New Delhi, a handwriting expert who prove his report (Ex.PW-32/L) and opined that the questioned signature at p