SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 162

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 9th January, 2018.

+ CS(OS) 272/2017 PREM PRAKASH GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Bharat Gupta and Mr. Varun Tyagi, Advs.

Versus SANJAY AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Ms. Garima Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit, pleading:

(i) that the plaintiff is 82 years of age and is the owner of property No.47/35, Punjabi Bagh West, New Delhi admeasuring 666.66 sq.

yds.;

(ii) that the plaintiff, along with his wife and two sons has been residing in the aforesaid property; after the marriage of the plaintiff‟s younger son, the plaintiff allowed the younger son and his wife to reside in a small portion of the house; the younger son of the plaintiff and his wife however made the life of the plaintiff and the plaintiff‟s wife miserable, so much so the elder son of the plaintiff shifted to a tenanted premises;

(iii) that the younger son of the plaintiff and his wife started a chain of litigations against the plaintiff and the plaintiff also sued for recovery of possession of the portion of the property aforesaid in their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top