IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ACHKAN ARVIND PRIYADARSHI MEENA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 13.11.2024 + W.P.(C) 12005/2019 ACHKAN ARVIND PRIYADARSHI MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advs.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr.Sameer Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the adverse remarks made by the Reporting Officer and the Reviewing Officer in the petitioner’s Annual Performance Appraisal Report (in short, ‘APAR’) for the year 2014-2015 as well as the Order dated 02.05.2019, whereby his representation against the said APAR was rejected.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner joined the Border Security Force (in short, ‘BSF’) as an Assistant Commandant on 03.10.2011. After completion of his training, he was posted to the 142 Bn, Assam, and thereafter he was posted to 164 Bn, Dera Baba Nanak (DBN), Punjab, on 26.12.2013. He was granted the benefit of the Senior Time Scale (in short, ‘STS’) with effect from 03.10.2015, along with his batchmates. However, the name of the Sign
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.