SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 32975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ACHKAN ARVIND PRIYADARSHI MEENA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 13.11.2024 + W.P.(C) 12005/2019 ACHKAN ARVIND PRIYADARSHI MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber and Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr.Sameer Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the adverse remarks made by the Reporting Officer and the Reviewing Officer in the petitioner’s Annual Performance Appraisal Report (in short, ‘APAR’) for the year 2014-2015 as well as the Order dated 02.05.2019, whereby his representation against the said APAR was rejected.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner joined the Border Security Force (in short, ‘BSF’) as an Assistant Commandant on 03.10.2011. After completion of his training, he was posted to the 142 Bn, Assam, and thereafter he was posted to 164 Bn, Dera Baba Nanak (DBN), Punjab, on 26.12.2013. He was granted the benefit of the Senior Time Scale (in short, ‘STS’) with effect from 03.10.2015, along with his batchmates. However, the name of the Sign

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top