SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATHALAL MAGANLAL CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 513 of 2020 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2741 of 2020 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Sd/-

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Sd/-

================================================================

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed YES

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? YES
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? YES
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? NO
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ? NO
================================================================

NATHALAL MAGANLAL CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ================================================================

Appearance:

MR CHETAN K PANDYA for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR KAMAL B.TRIVEDI, ADVOCATE GENERAL with MR VINAY VISHEN AND MR CHINTAN DAVE, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4 ================================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top