KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ADAM – Appellant
Versus
JAYAMALA P SHETTY – Respondent
ORDER
In this petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C, the accused has challenged his conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I Act, which came to be confirmed by the Sessions Court, by dismissing the appeal filed by him.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by the rank before the trial Court.
3. Complainant filed the complaint in question alleging that she and accused are known to each other since several years. On 17.08.2008, accused approached the complainant with a request to provide financial assistance in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for business purpose. He agreed to repay the same within a short time. Accordingly, complainant lent a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-. However, accused failed to keep up his promise and went on postponing the repayment.
Ultimately on the repeated request and demand by the complainant, accused issued cheque dated 23.10.2008. At the request of the accused, complainant withheld presentation of cheque and ultimately after intimating the accused, she presented the cheque through her account on 06.03.2009. However, to her shock and surprise the cheque was returned dishonoured on the ground of "Insufficient
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.