SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 50141

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J
SAHEEDA KUNJU MUHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Petitioner holds a land measuring 12.95 Ares in Survey No.864/11-2 of Vellurkunnam Village, of which a portion measuring 2.33 Ares is shown in the Revenue Records as 'Nilam'. The same, however, is not included in the data bank prepared under the Kerala conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (the Act). The land therefore falls within the definition of 'un-notified land' in terms of the provisions of the Act. In order to make use of the land for other purposes, the petitioner preferred an application for permission under Section 27A of the Act. On the said application, having satisfied that the land of the petitioner would fall within the definition of 'un-notified land', the first respondent has called upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.11,18,400/- towards the fees payable by her under Section 27A(3) of the Act. Ext.P5 is the communication issued in this regard by the first respondent. Ext.P5 is under challenge in the writ petition.

2. The case set out by the petitioner in the writ petition is that she is liable to pay only 20% of the fair value of the land towards the fees un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top