Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL KNARENDRAN, J
KOTTAMOM (KOTTIYAR MANGALAM) SRI DARMASASTHA TEMPLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for writ of certiorari and mandamus regarding autorickshaw stand. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's findings on national highway regulations. (Para 5) |
| 3. obstruction caused by parking at temple. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. previous court orders upheld regarding parking constraints. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. authority of grama panchayat to regulate parking. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. compliance with the kerala panchayat raj and motor vehicles act. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. affirmation of the role of national highways authority regarding traffic. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. regulatory framework under motor vehicles (driving) regulations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 9. legal restrictions on parking on footpaths and shared roadways. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 10. observations on pedestrian safety and use of footpaths. (Para 23 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. directions for grama panchayat and vehicle compliance. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 41) |
| 12. final directions and compliance orders issued. (Para 39 , 40 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, the Temple Advisory Committee of Kottiyarmangalam Sree Dharma Sastha Temple under the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
