Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 44225
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SIVANANDAN K N – Appellant
Versus
ANI P N – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1671 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.21157 OF 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI, SMT.MINI.K.NAIR
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI, SMT.MINI.K.NAIR
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE
The compliance with court directives must be assessed while preserving the party's rights to explore legal remedies.
Headnote:The court examines the compliance of directions outlined in the prior judgment (Annexure-A1) in the context of a contempt case. Despite the petitioner's claims, it is noted that the Form 5 application was rejected by the respondents, leading to the conclusion of the contempt proceedings. The court reserved rights for the petitioner to pursue further legal remedies.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. submission by petitioner on compliance. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal status of form 5 application. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied the directions in Annexure- A1 judgment.
2. The learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner’s Form 5 application has been rejected.
Recording the above submission, and by reserving the right of the petitioner to work out his remedies, in accordance with law, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
