IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
Babitha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar – Respondent
ORDER :
Challenging the concurrent findings of the Rent Controller as well as the appellate authority confirming the order of eviction under Section 21(2)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 , the present revision has been filed.
2. Brief background of filing this revision is as follows :
2.a. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a tenant under the respondents' father initially and later under the respondents. The petitioner is running a commercial establishment in the rented premises. Initially, the respondents' father Vasanthraj Khatod executed a Lease Deed in the year 1986 and thereafter in the year 2004, a fresh rental agreement entered after the demise of Vasanthraj Khatod, wherein the rent and security deposit were increased. From November 2010, the respondents claimed huge rental advance, which the petitioner refused to pay. Thereafter, eviction petition filed in R.C.O.P.No.964 of 2010 before the XVI Rent Controller, Small Causes Court, Chennai. The Rent Controller dismissed the eviction petition on the ground of owner's occupation and act of waste, however allowed the petition on the ground of subletting and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.