HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Jwala @ Mohit Rajput – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
This is the first bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail relating to FIR No.742/2022, registered at Police Station-Barela, District Jabalpur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 8 and 20 of N.D.P.S. Act.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant was not in conscious possession of the contraband substance. He was standing outside the house. House does not belong to him. There is no evidence on record to show that house belongs to applicant namely Jwala @ Mohit Rajput.
In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent/State opposed the bail application and submitted that applicant and co-accused were found outside the house. Ganja belong to applicant and joint seizure has been made. In these circumstances, application be dismissed.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Applicant was not found in conscious possession of contraband substance.
6. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, bail application filed by the applicant is allowed.
7. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.