SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 17908

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Puran Dhanak – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sourabh Bhushan Shrivastava,Advocate General

ORDER

1 . This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant, who is in jail since 13.10.2023 in connection with Crime No. 408/2023, registered at Police Station Udaypura District Raisen for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(L/6) of POCSO Act.

2 . Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that prosecutrix is more than 17 years of age and has entered the bracket of 18 years. She was consenting party. Applicant has been falsely implicated in the case of rape. In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as counsel for the objector have opposed the bail application and read over the statement of 164 Cr.P.C. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Considering the statement of prosecutrix and her age, bail application filed by the applicant is allowed.

6. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the sati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top