HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Akhilesh Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 48044/2023
BAIL - POCSO ACT - CONSENTING PARTY - SUICIDE - [The court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case where the prosecutrix was a consenting party and later committed suicide.]
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was accused of raping and abetting the suicide of a minor girl under Sections 376(3), 305 of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and that the father had falsely implicated him after the prosecutrix committed suicide.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the father had seen the prosecutrix with the applicant, but did not lodge any police report against the applicant. Later, the prosecutrix committed suicide and the report was lodged.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail in a POCSO case where the prosecutrix was a consenting party and later committed suicide.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to bail as the prosecutrix was a consenting party and there was no evidence to suggest that the applicant had abetted her suicide.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and surety.
ORDER
This is second bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail relating to FIR No.156/2022 registered at Police Station-Govindgarh, District-Rewa (MP) for the offence under Sections 376(3) & 305 of IPC & Section 3, 4 of POCSO Act.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Prosecutrix was consenting party. Father had seen applicant along with prosecutrix, therefore, false report has been lodged after prosecutrix committed suicide. In these circumstances, applicant may be released on bail.
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the bail application. It is submitted that father is eye-witness of the incident. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. On going through the facts of the case, it is found that father has seen prosecutrix along with applicant, thereafter, applicant ran away from spot.
Father along with prosecutrix came back to his house and then went to work.
He did not lodge any police report against applicant. Later on, proseuctrix has committed suicide and report has been lodged.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, bail application filed by the applicant is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.
7. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437(3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;
8. Certified copy as per rules. (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE nd (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE nd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.