SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12219

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
PAYAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

Leave granted.

1. The captioned appeals are directed against the order dated 11.03.2022 in C.R.M.-M. No.42226 of 2021 Signature Not Verified passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Digitally signed by Dr.

Naveen Rawal Date: 2024.11.26

13:43:35 IST Reason:

Chandigarh. The said petition was jointly filed by the appellant in the former appeal and her husband, the second respondent in the latter appeal, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) as petitioner Nos.2 and 1 respectively, seeking quashment of FIR No.0080/2020 dated 03.12.2020 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406 , 498-A of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’) at Police Station, District Police Commissionerate, Women, Jalandhar and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. In fact, after the registration of FIR No.0080/2020 at the instance of Subhash Chander Kapila, the second respondent in the former appeal, offences under Sections 420 and 120-B, IPC were also added. The appellant in the former appeal is accused No.5 and her husband, the second respondent in the latter appeal, was accused No.6 in the said FIR. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top