SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1954

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ANEES – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner's Advocate: RISHI MALHOTRA
Respondent's Advocate: B. V. BALARAM DAS

J U D G M E N T

J. B. PARDIWALA, J.:

For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: -

INDEX A. CASE OF THE PROSECUTION ............................................................... 3 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ......................... 15 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE STATE .................................... 17 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2024.05.03 D. ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 19 Reason:

i. Principles of law governing the applicability of Section 106 of the Evidence Act ............................................................................................. 19 ii. What is “prima facie case” (foundational facts) in the context of Section

106 of the Evidence Act? ......................................................................... 30 iii. Discovery of weapon under Section 27 of the Evidence Act ................ 35 iv. Cross-examination by the public prosecutor of a hostile witness ....... 38 v. Whether the appellant is entitled to the benefit of Exception 4 to Section

300 of the IPC? ........................

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top