SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12229

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
AMAL SATPATHI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Mehta, J.

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The present appeal has been filed by the Government of West Bengal1 and its components, challenging the judgment dated 1st February, 20232 passed by the High Court at Calcutta, in WPST No. 157 of 2019. The High Court vide impugned judgment upheld the order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal3, which directed that respondent No. 1, Dr. Amal Satpathi, though not Signature Not Verified Digitaly signed by KANCHAN CHOUHAN Date: 2024.11.27

16:24:26 IST

Reason:

1 Hereinafter being referred to as “appellant No. 1”.

2 Hereinafter being referred to as “Impugned judgment”.

3 Hereinafter being referred to as “Tribunal”.

entitled to retrospective promotion after his superannuation, should be awarded notional financial benefits for the promotional post of Chief Scientific Officer as of his retirement date i.e., 31st December, 2016. The appellants are aggrieved by this direction, contending that no financial benefits, even on a notional basis, are admissible to respondent No. 1 who never assumed charge of the promotional post.

Brief Facts: -

4. Respondent No.1, Dr. Amal Satpathi, was promoted to the post of Principal Scientific Officer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top