SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

YASH TUTEJA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
MALAK MANISH BHATT

ORDER

We have perused the documents filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. From the said documents, it appears that the predicate offence is offence punishable under various sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘IT Act’) read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. We direct the petitioners to produce a copy of the complaint filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short ‘PMLA’). The documents produced by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall be re-sealed and kept on record. List on 26.02.2024. I.A. No. 102540 of 2023 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 208 of 2023 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, states that the State of Chhattisgarh does not wish to press this application. Hence, I.A. No. 102540 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed. I.A. No. 258264 of 2023 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 216 of 2023 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw I.A. No. 228948 of 2023. Hence, I.A. No. 258264 of 2023 is allowed. Accordingly, I.A. No. 228948 of 2023 is disposed of as withdrawn. (POOJA SHARMA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top