YASH TUTEJA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
We have perused the documents filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. From the said documents, it appears that the predicate offence is offence punishable under various sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘IT Act’) read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. We direct the petitioners to produce a copy of the complaint filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short ‘PMLA’). The documents produced by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall be re-sealed and kept on record. List on 26.02.2024. I.A. No. 102540 of 2023 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 208 of 2023 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, states that the State of Chhattisgarh does not wish to press this application. Hence, I.A. No. 102540 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed. I.A. No. 258264 of 2023 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 216 of 2023 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw I.A. No. 228948 of 2023. Hence, I.A. No. 258264 of 2023 is allowed. Accordingly, I.A. No. 228948 of 2023 is disposed of as withdrawn. (POOJA SHARMA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.