SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
ASHOK KUMAR KALRA – Appellant
Versus
WING CDR SURENDRA AGNIHOTRI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.V. RAMANA, J.
1. Questions about procedural justice are remarkably persistent and usual in the life of Common Law Courts. However, achieving a perfect procedural system may be feasible or affordable, rather more manageable standards of meaningful participation needs to be aspired while balancing cost, time and accuracy at the same time.
Signature Not Verified
2. The present reference placed before us arises out of the order Digitaly signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2019.11.19
17:34:23 IST Reason:
dated 10.09.2018 passed by a two-Judge Bench of this Court, wherein clarification has been sought as to the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as “the CPC”), regarding the filing of counter-claim by a defendant in a suit. The reference order dated 10.09.2018 is extracted below:
“.........
The papers to be placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for constitution of a three-Judge Bench to look into the effect of our previous judgments as well as whether the language of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Civil Procedure Code is mandatory in nature.”
(emphasis supplied)
3. Before we proceed further, we need to allude to the brief factu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.