SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(SC) 24

B.N. AGRAWAL,P.P. NAOLEKAR,P. SATHASIVAM
HARIOM AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH CHAND MALVIYA – Respondent


Advocates:
T. MAHIPALDHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 7

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 4696 of 2007

PETITIONER:

Hariom Agrawal

RESPONDENT:

Prakash Chand Malviya

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/10/2007

BENCH:

B.N. AGRAWAL,P.P. NAOLEKAR & P. SATHASIVAM

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.12573 of 2006)

P.P. NAOLEKAR, J.:

1. Leave granted.

2. The facts necessary for deciding the question

involved in the case are that one Maganlal Jain was the

original tenant of Prakash Chand Malviya, the respondent-

landlord. Maganlal Jain had given the shop to the appellant

for carrying out the business. On a dispute being arisen

between the respondent-landlord, the original tenant Maganlal

Jain and the appellant herein, an agreement was executed on

28.3.1988 by the respondent (landlord) and the appellant

(subsequent tenant), whereby the landlord tenanted the shop

to the appellant on payment of an advance amount of

Rs.4,75,000/- which was received by the landlord in cash in

front of the witnesses. The agreement further provided that in

case the landlord requires eviction of the tenant from the shop

he will have to give notice of 6 m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top