SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 4186

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Surya Kant, Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta, JJ
SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
B.D. KAUSHIK & ANR. – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application | Diary No(s). 13992/2023 | C.A.Nos.3401-3402/2003



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Monika Gusain, Sr.Adv., Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Divyanshu S., Adv., Mr. Jeetendra Kumar, Adv., Mr. Pawan Kumar Dhiman, Adv., Mr. Gautam Das, Adv., Mr. Darshan Anand Gaur, Adv., Mr. Tarun S., Adv., Mr. Rajendra Singh Chauhan, Adv. and others

The judgment emphasizes the obligation of the petitioner to substantiate complaints with affidavits and maintains court orders requiring personal appearance.

Headnote:The court analyzed various applications concerning the grievances regarding the elections of the Supreme Court Bar Association under applicable laws. The petitioner acknowledged a complaint made to the police and was directed to file an affidavit confirming the complaint's accuracy. The court directed the petitioner to appear in future hearings.

Table of Content
1. court's acknowledgment of the advocate's appearance and obligations. (Para 1)
2. petitioner directed to file an affidavit regarding the complaint. (Para 2)
3. petitioner to remain present for further court proceedings. (Para 3)
4. matter to be listed for the next hearing as per court order. (Para 4)

O R D E R

1. Pursuant to the order dated 27.05.2025, Dr. Mukut Nath Verma, Advocate, has appeared in person online.

2. He has acknowledged that the complaint dated 26.05.2025 to Police Station Tilak Marg, New Delhi – 110 001 has been made by him. He is directed to file an affidavit in support of the contents of the complaint taking the responsibility that the complaint dated 26.05.2025 is sent by him and that the contents of the same are correct as per his knowledge.

3. Dr. Mukut Nath Verma, Advocate is directed to remain present in the Court on the next date of hearing.

4. List on the date already fixed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top