SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 419

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.18655 OF 2024 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Justice Sujoy Paul)

Heard Ms. Mytri Indukuru, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, for the respondents- Income Tax Department and Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for the respondents-Central Government.

2. The ground taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is that in furtherance of Finance Act, 2021, re- assessment process stood modified but the respondents have not taken care of it and therefore notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot sustain judicial scrutiny. Since notice is bad in law, the consequential orders are also bad in law.

3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties agreed that curtains on this issue are finally drawn by this Court in a batch of writ petitions, W.P.No.25903 of 2022 and other connected matters, decided by common order dated 14.09.2023. The parties agreed that this matter may be disposed of in term

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top