Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Gangubai Bablya Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Bhalchandra Sukhtankar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ownership and possession of the property through a series of registered deeds. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 2. defendant disputes the validity of the relinquishment deed and claims title through familial relations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court emphasizes the need for a full trial to resolve triable issues regarding possession and title. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. appellate court's ruling to grant injunction is upheld based on established prima facie title and possession. (Para 34) |
| 5. civil revision petition is dismissed, confirming the appellate court's decision. (Para 35) |
ORDER:
Heard Mr. Shyam S. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ch.Ravinder, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 11.08.2023 passed in CMA No.18 of 2021 by the learned I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar.
(For sake of convenience, the petitioner herein is referred to as ‘defendant’ and respondent as ‘plaintiff ’)
FACTS:-
3. Plaintiff filed a suit vide O.S.No.171 of 2021 against the defendant seeking perpetual injunction restraining the defend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
