Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA, J
N/A – Appellant
Versus
N/A – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case facts establish the basis for compensation claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding compensation inadequacy and income proof. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. tribunal's assessment of injury and compensation breakdown. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final decision to enhance compensation issued. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT:
Heard Sri K. Hari Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S. Satyananda Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.3. Perused the entire record.
2. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant/petitioner aggrieved by the award passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in M.V.O.P.No.1277 of 2016, dated 18.05.2023, wherein the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , seeking compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- was partly allowed awarding compensation of Rs.1,28,900/- with interest at 7% per annum.
3. The brief facts are that the accident which lead to the filing of claim petition had occurred on 14.01.2016 at about 07:00 AM, when the appellant and his wife were proceeding on Activa vehicle bearing No.TS 07 EM 4722 from Kondapur to Bowenpally. When they reached
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
