SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Rani – Respondent


CM APPL. NO. 2805/11 and LA.APP.71/2011

Page 1 of 5

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

CM APPL. NO. 2805/11 AND LA.APP.71/2011

+

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2011

#

UNION OF INDIA

...Petitioner

!

Through: Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate

Versus

$ PUSHPA RANI

....Respondent

Through: Mr. S.K Sethi,Advocate for DDA/R-2

CORAM:

*

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed

to see the judgment? (No)

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? (No)

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? (No)

ORDER

P.K BHASIN,J

This application has been filed by the appellant under Order 41

rule 3A and Section 151 of the CPC and section 5 of Limitation Act

seeking condonation of delay of 367 days in filing the present appeal

against the judgment dated 13.05.2010 passed by the learned Additional

District Judge in LAC no. 641 A/08 whereby the amount of

compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector @ Rs

15,70,000/- per ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top