SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RATUL PURI – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Respondent


W.P.(C) 2464/2017

Page 1 of 2

$~25.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 2464/2017 and CM APPL. 10630-32/2017

RATUL PURI

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Manisha Dhir,

Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr. Vaibhav Tyagi,

Advocates

versus

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Sartaj Singh, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

O R D E R

%

17.03.2017

1. At the outset, counsel for the respondent/Bank states that the Bank is

in the process of withdrawing the impugned notice to show cause dated

06.03.2017, whereunder the petitioner has been called upon to appear

personally or through an authorised representative before the Committee of

Wilful Defaulters on 21.03.2017. He states that thereafter a fresh notice to

show cause shall be issued to the petitioner in accordance with law.

2. In view of the fact that the respondent/Bank proposes to withdraw the

impugned notice to show cause dated 06.03.2017 and cancel the meeting

scheduled for 21.03.2017, with liberty to issue fresh notice to show cause in

2017:DHC:1589

W.P.(C) 2464

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top