SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
KUNAL TRAVELS (CARGO) – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL) – Respondent


CUSAA 1-2016 & 12-2016

Page 1 of 15

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

CUSAA 1/2016

KUNAL TRAVELS (CARGO)

..... Appellant

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL)

NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent

AND

+

CUSAA 12/2016

KUNAL TRAVELS (CARGO)

..... Appellant

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

(IMPORT & GENERAL)

..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant:

Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai,

Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

NAJMI WAZIRI, J.:-

1. These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated

08.06.2015 of the CESTAT, which upheld the order-in-original dated

01.05.2007 passed by the respondent Commissioner of Customs revoking

the appellant‟s Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiting its

security deposit of Rs.1 lakh.

CUSAA 1-2016 & 12-2016

Page 2 of 15

2. The said license was granted under the Customs House Agents

Licensing Regulations, (CHALR), 2004. The appellant had filed two

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top