SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VINOD KUMAR DHALL – Appellant
Versus
DHARAMPAL DHALL AND ANR. – Respondent


RFA 400/2010

Page 1 of 12

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment delivered on : October 27, 2017

+

RFA 400/2010

VINOD KUMAR DHALL

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with

Mr.K.R.Chawla,

Mr.Harsh Kumar,

Advocates.

versus

DHARAMPAL DHALL AND ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Adv.

with

Mr.Dinesh Kumar Gupta,

Mr.Vidit Gupta,

Mr.Prakash Pandey,

Advocates for LRs of R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

JUDGMENT

P.S.TEJI, J.

1.

Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 01.05.2010 passed

by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit for

recovery, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction filed by

the respondent No.1/plaintiff has been decreed in his favour, the

appellant/defendant No.1 has filed the present appeal.

RFA 400/2010

Page 2 of 12

2.

The facts narrated in the plaint filed before the Court below are

that a suit was filed before the Trial Court by respondent No.1/plaintiff

for recovery, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction with

respect to the suit property No.ED-48, Tagore Garden, New Delhi

measuring 149.33 square yards as a leasehold property under the

perpetual lease deed executed by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top