SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

REQ. CASE No.20 of 2009

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA

with

REQ. CASE No.19 of 2009

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA

----------

For the Petitioner: Mr Jayanta Mitre, Senior Advocate

Mr P.K.Dutte, Senior Advocate

Mr. Subhro Sanyal, Advocate

For the Respondent: Mr Mahesh Prasad

Standing Counsel Railways

----------

02/

13.11.2009

Both the matters arise out of the same agreement

between the same parties who are also parties in these two cases.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

respondent.

3. Request case no. 20 of 2009 has been filed on behalf of

the petitioner, which is a construction company, under section 11(6)

of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (hereinafter referred to

as >the Ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top