SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH - PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
MALKEET SINGH GILL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


C A V ORDER

13/02/2020

1. Cr.R. No.89 of 2006 has been filed challenging the judgment dated

29.01.2005 passed in Criminal Appeal No.17/2004 and Cr.R. No.95 of 2006 has been filed challenging the judgment dated 29.01.2005 in Criminal Appeal No.21/2004, in which the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, C.G., in Criminal Case No.1589/2003 delivered on

16.12.2003 was upheld, therefore, both the revision petitions are being disposed off by this common order.

2. The complainant- Ajay Kumar Meenpal, lodged F.I.R. in Police Station, Bilaspur, City- Kotwali on 12.06.1998 that applicant Ambika Prasad Mishra was Director of Rewanchal Vitt Avam Vyavasayik Vikas Ltd. and applicant Malkeet singh Gill, Regional Manager of the said company, their office was stituated in Dhamtari since the year 1994-98. The complainant has alleged that he was induced by applicant Malkeet Singh Gill that his company is recognized by Indian Reserve Bank and on making deposits the depositor will receive 08-10% annual interest on the same. The complainant and others made the deposits in the schemes of the company, subsequently their company office was cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top