Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT GOA
S. A. BOBDE, J
Dr. Celsa Pinto – Appellant
Versus
The Goa State Information Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to the goa information commission's order. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's evaluation of the commission's conclusions on information provision. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's ruling and recognition of legal error. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith.
2. Heard by consent.
3. The petitioner is Public Information Officer appointed as such under the Right to Information Act, 2005 . She has challenged the order dated 27.7.2007 passed by the Goa Information Commission holding her responsible for furnishing incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to the respondent No.2 and also for providing false information.
4. The respondent No.2 had sought the following information from the P.I.O. under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
| Information sought by the Complainant | Information provided by the Opponent |
|---|---|
| III 186/c letter from GPSC No.COM/1 /1/15/1705/754 dated 03/11/2006 | N.A. |
| XIV 146/c letter No.COM/11/11/15(1)05 dated 12/06/2006 regarding filling up the post of Curator clarify | N.A. |
| XV 117/c letter from GPSC to communicate seniority list of Librarian may be sent if not then kindly clarify under what p | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
