SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
PITCHAI @ NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S A ARASU GANESAN', '', 'A BAKKIYARAJ', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.03.2016

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

Crl.O.P.No.3784 of 2016

Pitchai @ Navaneethakrishnan

.. Petitioner

Vs.

State by Inspector of Police,

District Crime Branch,

Cuddalore,

Cuddalore District.

.. Respondent

Prayer:-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482

Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police not to harass the

petitioner in police summons H3/035637/1265/15 on the file of

the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arasu Ganesan

For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias

Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking

for a direction, directing the respondent not to harass the

petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

on the basis of the complaint given by one Chinnathambi, the

respondent is harassing the petitioner under the guise of

enquiry and hence, he pray for direction directing the

respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

3. Resisting the same, the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submit that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top