SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice R. THARANI
DHANALAKSHMI, – Appellant
Versus
K.K.VELUSAMY, – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Mr.K.Suresh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2.This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed in I.A.No.559 of 2013 in O.S.No.216 of 2012 dated 06.10.2015 on the file of the learned Additional Sub ordinate Judge, Karur.

3.The petitioners herein are the defendants 1 and 2 and the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.216 of 2012 for recovery of money. In that suit, the petitioners filed a petition in I.A.No.559 of 2013 for sending the document for expert opinion. The petition was dismissed by the trial Court. Against the dismissal order, the petitioners have come forward with the revision petition.

4.On the side of the petitioners, it is stated that the petitioners are the legal heirs of one S.V.Subramania Pillai. The https://hcpselrvaiciesn.etcoiurfts.fgo v.fin/ihclseervdice s/a suit on the basis of promissory note which is said to have been executed by the said S.V.Subramania Pillai. The defendants denied the signature of S.V.Subramania Pillai in the promissory note and claimed the document as a forged one.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top