SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT AND OTHERS. – Respondent


Item No.202

After Notice

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT JAMMU

(THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)

WP(C) No.4523/2019

CM No.9575/2019

Rajesh Kumar

…Petitioner(s)

Through:

Mr. Vikram Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with

Mr. Sachindev Singh, Advocate.

V/s

Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir

…Respondents

Through:

Mr. F. A. Natnoo, AAG.

CORAM:

Hon’ble Mr Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge.

(ORDER)

30.12.2020

Objections have been filed.

Mr Sharma, learned senior counsel feels satisfied with the reply filed by the

respondents and, therefore, submits that he does not want to press this petition any

more. His statement is taken on record.

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed along with all connected CMs.

Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.

(Sanjeev Kumar)

Judge

Jammu

30.12.2020

Abdul Qayoom, PS”

ABDUL QAYOOM LONE

2020.12.31 17:11

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top