HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.N.PHANEENDRA
SMT. SHANAJ BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/5663/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5663 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHANAJ BEGUM
W/O. AZEES PASHA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
HOUSE WIFE,
R/O. 22, 6TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
SHAMANNA GARDEN,
MYSORE ROAD,
BENGALURU CITY 560 026
... PETITIONER
(By Sri. B.SIDDESWARA, ADV.)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BYATARAYANAPURA POLICE STATION,
(REP BY THE SPP,
HIGH COURT PREMISES,
BENGALURU).
... RESPONDENT
(By Sri.ROHITH.B.J, HCGP)
THIS CRL.PETITION IS FILED U/S.438 CR.P.C PRAYING
TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HER
ARREST IN CR.NO.181/2019 OF BYATARAYANAPURA P.S.,
BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 341,302 R/W 34
OF IPC.
2
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned High Court Government Pleader for State.
Perused the records.
2. The petitioner is arraigned as accused No.3 in
Crime No.181/2019 for the offences under Section 341,
302 r/w 34 of IPC. Initially, a case was registered for
the above said offences, subsequently as the injured
succumbed to the injuries, the case has been converted
to offence under Section 302 of IPC and charge sheet
has been laid against the accused persons.
3. The allegations as per the charge sheet is that
the deceased Norulla, about three years ago, married
CW-4 Smt.Ayesha Bhanu. There was no compatibility
between the two. Though they were blessed with one
child, there was some differences between them. It
appears that the petitioner was advising the deceased
3
and differences arose between the deceased, the
petitioner and said Ayeesha Bhanu. In this context, it is
alleged that on 15.05.2019 in the afternoon, the
accused No.3 was inside the house and accused Nos.1
and 2 have gone to the deceased stating that there was
quarrel between the accused No.3 and the deceased. In
this context, accused Nos.1 and 2 went to the deceased
and accused No.2 caught hold the deceased and
accused No.1 stabbed him with a knife which caused
severe injuries to the chest and stomach of the
deceased, later he succumbed to the said injuries.
4. Looking to the above said factual matrix of the
case, there is no specific allegations made against the
accused No.3 and she never participated in the crime
and she was not present at the time of the incident
when accused Nos.1 and 2 assaulted the deceased.
Under the above said circumstances, the petitioner has
4
made out a ground for grant of bail for the above said
offences. Hence, the following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. Consequently, the
petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of her
arrest in connection with Crime No.181/2019 of
Byatarayanapura Police station for the offence under
Sections 341, 302 r/w 34 of IPC, subject to the
following conditions:-
i)
The
petitioner
shall
surrender
herself
before the Investigating Officer within Ten
days from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order and she shall execute
personal bond for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-
with one surety for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating
officer.
ii)
The
petitioner
shall
not
indulge
in
tampering the prosecution witnesses.
iii)
The
petitioner
shall
not
leave
the
jurisdiction without prior permission, till
5
the case registered against her is disposed
of.
iv)
The petitioner shall appear before the
jurisdictional Court on all the future
hearing dates unless exempted for any
genuine reason.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ln.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.