SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39811

SUNDARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


The petitioner approached the Revenue

Divisional Officer with an appeal, challenging

the proceedings initiated under the Kerala Land

Conservancy Act. In the meanwhile steps were

taken to survey the land of the petitioner.

Petitioner approached the Court seeking the

following reliefs:

“1)

Direct the 2nd respondent to hear

and decide Ext.P2 appeal on merits

with in a time frame fixed by this

Hon'ble Court.

2)

Direct the respondents 3 to 5 to

stop all further proceedings against

the property of the petitioner and the

adjacent

government

land

in

Sy.No.538/1/173A of Valacode village

pending hearing and disposal of Ext.P2

appeal by the 2nd respondent.

3)

Pass such other orders deemed fit

and proper in the circumstances of the

case.”

The petitioner is free to prosecute an appeal

in accordance with law.

However, nothing

..4..

prevents the Revenue Authority in surveying the

Government land. In such circumstances, I find

no reason to issue any orders in the matter.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

PR/30.05.2019

..5..

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

COPY OF ORDER DTD.28.10.09 IN LC CASE

NO.20/2008 OF THE 3RD RESPOND

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top