SUNDARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
The petitioner approached the Revenue
Divisional Officer with an appeal, challenging
the proceedings initiated under the Kerala Land
Conservancy Act. In the meanwhile steps were
taken to survey the land of the petitioner.
Petitioner approached the Court seeking the
following reliefs:
“1)
Direct the 2nd respondent to hear
and decide Ext.P2 appeal on merits
with in a time frame fixed by this
Hon'ble Court.
2)
Direct the respondents 3 to 5 to
stop all further proceedings against
the property of the petitioner and the
adjacent
government
land
in
Sy.No.538/1/173A of Valacode village
pending hearing and disposal of Ext.P2
appeal by the 2nd respondent.
3)
Pass such other orders deemed fit
and proper in the circumstances of the
case.”
The petitioner is free to prosecute an appeal
in accordance with law.
However, nothing
..4..
prevents the Revenue Authority in surveying the
Government land. In such circumstances, I find
no reason to issue any orders in the matter.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
PR/30.05.2019
..5..
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ORDER DTD.28.10.09 IN LC CASE
NO.20/2008 OF THE 3RD RESPOND
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.