SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO – Respondent


Advocates:
['SR STANDING COUNSELS AND ME', 'BISWABIHARI MOHANTY', 'J N PANDA', 'M HARICHANDAN', 'B TRIPATHY']

Page 1 of 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 25635 of 2017

State of Odisha and others

&..

Petitioners

Mr. S. Jena, S.C.(S&ME) Deptt.

Vs.

Saroj Kumar Sahoo and another

&..

Opposite Parties

Mr. B. Mohanty, Adv.

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER

23.09.2022

Order No.

04.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has

challenged

the

order

dated

05.04.2017

passed

by

the

Odisha

Administrative

Tribunal,

Principal

Bench,

Bhubaneswar in O.A. No. 669 of 2014.

4.

The issue involved in this case is covered by the

decision of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 7707 of 2017 and a

batch

of

writ

petitions,

which

were

disposed

of

on

05.02.2018 with the following order:

<Heard

Mr.

Manoranjan

Mohanty,

learned

Senior

Advocate

assisted

by

Mrs.

Subhasree

Mohanty,

learned

counsel

for

the

petitioners-

applicants, Mr. B. Rout, learned Standing Counsel

for School & Mass Education Department and Mr.

K.

Swain,

learned

counsel

for

opposite

party-

applicant in W.P.(C) No. 128

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top