SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
GIAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


R.S.A NO.1128 OF 1987

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

R.S.A NO.1128 OF 1987

Date of Decision 29.10.2009

Gian Chand

........ Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana and another

........ Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General,

Haryana.

M.M.KUMAR, J.

This is the plaintiff's appeal filed under Section 100 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated

10.9.1986, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala,

reversing the view taken by the trial Court. The trial Court had decreed the

suit of the plaintiff-appellant in his favour but the learned Additional District

Judge, dismissed the suit by recording a finding that it was time barred.

The learned Additional District Judge had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-

appellant in which he had claimed that the order dated 26.4.1982, passed

by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Ambala, withholding his

efficiency bar at the stage of Rs.80/- in the scale of Rs.70-2-80/3-95 with

effect from 1.2.1981, was illegal, void, arbitrary and against the relevant

mandatory provisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top